Paul Ryan: Also Sick of Your Bullshit

Speculation abounds that someone finally has goat pictures on Paul Ryan damning enough to make him call it quits. Mueller? Trump? Putin?

No, no, and no.

Occam’s razor, people.

Paul Ryan is 48 years old, smack in the middle of Gen X. And, as those of us who share his generational affliction know deep in our bones, and the rest of you learned from Gizmodo back in 2011, both Paul Ryan and Gen X are sick of your bullshit. 

Ryan calling it quits makes perfect sense. He’s tired of waiting for the boomers to get out of the way or die. Boomer congressmen—and let’s be clear, I don’t mean men in a gender-inclusive way, but male men—have attached to their seats, limpet-like, and are going nowhere. Ever.

The millennials, meanwhile, and the generation after them that no one has bothered to differentiate from millennials except the people in it and the folks at Pew, are getting all the good press. And the bad press, but all press is good press.

I’m not a Paul Ryan fan. He picked the losing team, as far as getting it right for history goes, and he can curl up fetal in the bed he made for himself and deal with that choice for the rest of forever as far as I’m concerned.

But I get him.

Gen X has been calling it quits for a while now. It’s what we do, and we do it well.

We understand there is no upside to anything, but certainly not to sticking around for a lost cause. We’ll just do all the work and take all the blame and watch our hair thin and our friends die way too young and struggle to figure out SnapChat not realizing it’s totally pointless and never get the credibility or credit we have earned and deserve.

So go home, Paul Ryan. Let Randy Bryce step up to serve. You know you like him and you’ll probably vote for him. Because you, like me, like most in our generation, are secretly part of the burn it all down caucus. Take pleasure in seeing the GOP implode and know that it would have happened with you there, so it might as well happen without you.

And know that whatever job you take next, it won’t be selling out, because your selling out happened long, long ago. Now, it’s just about self-preservation, and I won’t begrudge you that.


By the way, Randy Bryce is one of us, too, even if he is on the cusp. He’s been out there the longest, conserving his energy, building up an actual skill and accomplishing things that are real instead of striving in a bullshit world. He’ll do great. He’ll outlive the boomers, and he’ll welcome the millennials and the post-millennials. I can’t wait to see him in office.

 

Advertisements
Posted in politics | Leave a comment

GOP Dirty Tricks in HD 134

Lloyd Oliver entering the Texas House District 134 as a Democrat is part of the reactionary-right plot to remove Sarah Davis from office. It’s straight from GOP Dirty Tricks 101.

Davis is hoping to beat her well-funded GOP-insider opponent in the primary by winning the swing voters of that district, pro-choice women who are in the middle enough that they’ll vote for the state’s one milquetoast not-quite-as-wretchedly-anti-Planned-Parenthood Republican as protection against a worse Republican.

But with cringe-inducing sexist buffoon Lloyd Oliver on the Democratic ticket, those voters will now be forced to consider the consequences of voting Republican—they might end up with a viscid and vile reprobate on the ballot for the Ds in the year of #MeToo.

Oliver, a man who said women who were victims of intimate partner violence shouldn’t go to court, but to boxing lessons, and explained away the violence by suggesting it was just foreplay. Really.

Do those swing voters pick Allison Sawyer, the Democrat, to keep Oliver off the ballot?

Or do they pick Sarah Davis to block her opponent, settling once again for the tepid tea of well-at-least-she’s-not-as-bad-as-the-rest-of-them representation?

Don’t be fooled. This isn’t just about a Texas House race.

This goat rope in the 134th has an impact on other races.

There’s strong overlap with CD-7, the most Democratic-trending GOP-held district in the country. With 7 Democrats in that race, every primary vote that doesn’t show up in the D column, and especially every woman’s vote that doesn’t show up in the D column, helps that blathering blemish of a do-nothing Republican, John Culberson, stay in power.

The most dangerous outcome for the GOP is strong pro-choice Democratic women with broad appeal and significant business experience winning in both the CD-7 and HD134 primaries, and then again in the general.

To clarify, the Republicans do not want to see a Lizzie Pannill Fletcher v. John Culberson match-up in CD-7 with Allison Sawyer in HD134 giving a vulnerable Republican a run for the money at the same time. 

This is the year Democrats could re-claim both of these seats. This is not a drill. That’s why EMILY’S List has endorsed Fletcher in the race.

Republicans will do anything to stop that from happening.

I don’t think Lloyd Oliver decided to enter this race of his own volition. I believe he was invited in by GOP operatives. Possibly some of the same ones whose fingerprints are already starting to show up in the CD-7 race.

Do I really think that this happens?

You bet.

Story time.

I met a man late one night in Jackson, Mississippi. One of the ways white privilege works is that people who are white assume that other white people share their political views and biases.

This man told me the story of being a young Republican political operative the year Democratic Senator James Eastland left office. A popular Misssissippi Democrat, Maurice Dantin, entered the race, as did a Republican named Thad Cochran. Dantin was favored to win.

This man I met was given thousands of dollars and sent, with a friend, to recruit a candidate who would split the Democratic vote. He and his friend recruited Charles Evers, mayor of Fayette and brother to the civil rights leader Medgar Evers, who had been assassinated in 1963 by a white supremacist.

Evers and Dantin split the vote, and Cochran won. He’s still there, forty years later.

Now, I don’t have proof. I can’t even remember the guy’s name, although I know how I could go about finding it out. But I have no reason not to believe it, especially in light of the stories I heard from a former boss who, with her then-husband whose name you might recognize, Roger Stone, got up to all sorts of dirty tricks and manipulation in GOP politics in the 70s in Virginia alongside their good friend Lee Atwater. Don’t know him? Google him.

This is the long-standing modus operandi of the party of Nixon.

What do I recommend?

Democrats and pro-choice independents and moderate pro-choice Republicans should support and vote for Allison Sawyer in the 134th and Lizzie Pannill Fletcher in the CD-7 primaries.

Then, work like hell to turn out votes for them in November.

Don’t get pulled into defending Sarah Davis. Even if she wins, she will be so marginalized and targeted by the religious zealots like Dan Patrick that she will be forced to vote against Planned Parenthood and common sense gun safety measures. Realize that even if she finds the courage to vote for PP or gun sense, she’s just one vote.

Do you want a symbolic vote, or do you want to win?

Symbolic votes don’t win. Majorities do.

It’s time to turn out for Democratic women if you care about the future of Texas, starting in HD 134 and CD 7.

 

Posted in politics | 2 Comments

Buy Local, Fight Gentrification, Invest in Black Women

From I ❤️ 3W by Marc Newsome, one of the installations in Round 47 at Project Row Houses.

Gifts with political heft that support local businesses and organizations? What’s not to love? Here’s the Third Ward edition:

Get A Membership to Project Row Houses
Launched 25 years ago by a collective of artists, I’m going to let PRH’s website explain it:

Project Row Houses (PRH) is a community-based arts and culture non-profit organization in Houston’s northern Third Ward, one of the city’s oldest African American neighborhoods. Founded in 1993 as a result of the vision of local African-American artists wanting a positive creative presence in their own community, PRH shifts the view of art from traditional studio practice to a more conceptual base of transforming the social environment.

Central to the vision of PRH is the social role of art as seen in neighborhood revitalization, historic preservation, community service, and youth education. The programs of PRH are built around Five Pillars inspired by the work of internationally renowned artist John Biggers and his principles concerning the components of row house communities: art & creativity, education, social safety nets, architecture, and sustainability.

Friday, December 8th is a great time to visit the site, meet the supporters, and become a member. Your ticket to Cocktails in the Courtyard gets you a membership, but you can always buy more for the people in your life who appreciate art, activism, and community revitalization.

Even if you can’t come for Cocktails in the Courtyard, get your membership online and invest in an organization that’s been investing in Third Ward for 25 years. With all that will be happening during this anniversary year, you’ll want to be an insider.

Eat Cookies Like You’ve Never Experienced – CrumbvilleTX
Ella Russell’s bakery, CrumbvilleTX, packs a punch. The cookies and cupcakes are as delicious as they are inventive, and you can special order cakes in addition to the smaller treats.

Keep track of what’s coming out of the oven on Instagram (edubalicioustreats). Cookie Minaj, Chance the Cookie, Mayniac Munch … music in your mouth. Vegans and butter-fiends alike will be happy with the options.

The venture started out as an installation for PRH’s Round 43, Small Business, Big Change, but has become a permanent fixture on the ground floor below the historic El Dorado Ballroom on Elgin at Emancipation Boulevard, the once and future Third Ward Main Street.

Chocolate with white chocolate and caramel and peppermint chips. That’s a good-ass cookie.

Go On A Home Tour – The Real Riverside Terrace Home Tour
In flat-out WTF-land, realtors who do not live in this historic neighborhood have created a new civic association and scheduled a “home tour” that seems to be more about selling real estate than anything else one week before the actual legit Blue Triangle Garden Club.

The actual legit home tour that has been going on for 56 years, run by actual residents.

Seriously. Read what the Forward Times has uncovered.

Houston will never escape our legacy/destiny as a real estate development Shangri-La, but people, we can do so much better than this complete and utter nonsense.

Get a ticket to the real-deal Christmas home tour on December 10th. Even if you can’t go, you can support the event.

Help Save History – Blue Triangle Community Center
The Blue Triangle, once a YWCA, houses an amazing mural by John Biggers, The Contribution of The Negro Woman to American Life and Education. Already in need of restoration, the mural was further imperiled by damage from Hurricane Harvey.

The story told in the mural is the story playing out throughout the Third Ward. The art keeps watch over the people keeping watch over the community. Make a contribution, or, if you’re really feeling the love, make your mark by underwriting the restoration.

Contribution of The Negro Woman to American Life and Education

 

Posted in gift ideas, Houston, politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Stan Stanart’s Moment to Be a Hero – Or a Villain

It’s August 30th in Houston. We’re mucking out homes, provisioning families with everything they need since everything they had is done, repairing roofs, restocking shelves, and wondering how on earth we’re going to recover from Hurricane Harvey.

But it’s only about 7 weeks until early voting starts for this November’s elections.

It’s not too early to talk about politics. What’s going on is in many ways directly related to politics.

Now is Harris County Clerk’s time to decide whether to be a hero or a villain.

On the one hand, County Clerk Stan Stanart could be a hero and put in place the procedures and equipment necessary for people registered to vote in Harris County to vote at any precinct or early voting-style polling location on Election Day.

He should also extend early voting hours to the maximum number allowed by law.

After all, this election will have very low turn-out for some very high-stakes positions on the Houston ISD Board of Trustees.

Thousands of people are displaced from their homes, having left without critical papers they may need to re-establish themselves. They could be living in friends’ rooms, apartments, hotels, or (let’s hope not but worst case scenario) shelters or FEMA trailers by the time it is voting time.

The place they usually vote might not even BE there come election day.

With a crisis of this magnitude, Stanart & his office should do whatever it takes to make it easy for people to vote in whatever part of town they find themselves in come election day. The early voting options we already have are not enough.

The law is written so he can authorize changes like these. He can check in with his colleagues in Travis County for guidance.

On the other hand, #FireStanStanart is a perennial hashtag for a reason.

The long lines, the machines that don’t work first thing in the morning, the polling sites changing last minute … this isn’t ineptitude, it’s intentional, and designed to suppress votes.

The clerk can prove me wrong if he wishes by following my advice and making it easier for people to vote.

The leaders of our great city and county should call on Clerk Stanart to be as generous with his access to democracy’s sacred duty, voting, as the rest of us have been toward our storm-tossed neighbors. Harris County voters should demand it as well.

Posted in politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Fear and Loathing and Buses in the Suburbs

Spring Happenings is an online journal for folks living in that little slice of heaven north of the beltway between Hwy 249 and I-45.

And to keep it heavenly, Spring Happening’s president, Zach Karrenbrock is urging readers to attend a community hearing to oppose METRO’s plans to run a bus line to Spring.

“Implementing METRO bus service in Spring will give criminals an easy way in and out of our community,” said Karrenbrock. “I believe some type of public transportation is needed, especially since Spring is growing at such a rapid rate, however, a METRO bus line is NOT the answer.”

It’s nothing new to hear people oppose new rail or bus lines by warning that public transit creates an express lane for criminals.

It’s also not true. Burglars don’t take the bus.

In a very comprehensive study, Journeys to CrimeAssessing the Effects of a Light Rail Line on Crime in the Neighborhoods, researchers at the examined this myth:

The implementation of new transit lines is some times dogged by concerns that such lines may increase crime rates in station neighborhoods. Affluent communities have often complained that transit lines transport crime to the suburbs. This study focuses on the Green Line transit system in Los Angeles and examines its effects on crime in the adjacent areas. The Green Line light rail system passes through some high-crime inner city neighborhoods and terminates at its western end in affluent suburban communities. The study examines neighborhood level and municipality-wide crime trends for five years before and five years after the inception of the line. A piecewise regression model is developed to evaluate the impact of the opening of the line in the station neighborhoods. GIS analysis is also utilized to identify spatial shifts in crime hot spots for the municipalities abutting the Green Line. At the end, the study establishes that the transit line has not had significant impacts on crime trends or crime dislocation in the station neighborhoods, and has not transported crime from the inner city to the suburbs.

Public transit has faced the myth of the criminal many times. As a result, some pockets of major urban centers are transit deserts, cut off from culture and commerce.

One of the most frustrating parts of visiting Washington, D.C., for example, is that the very efficient and easy to use subway does not go into Georgetown. Residents of that tony territory were also convinced criminals would use the Metro to sneak in and steal their silver. <Insert snarky and cynical comment about the fact that the lobbyists, lawyers, politicians, and diplomatic hangers-on are now stuck using town car service instead of the Metro to get in and out of Georgetown while stealing our nation’s silver.>

This is not to say that crime doesn’t happen on or near trains or buses. It does. But that’s because crime happens, full stop. Criminals don’t come into being only when conjured by two bus tokens being rubbed together.

At best, those who oppose expanding public transit options are misguided folk who’ve never stopped to consider that a person fleeing the scene of a crime would hardly want to risk waiting at a bus stop on a major thoroughfare for 20 minutes in afternoon rush hour while wearing a mask and holding a 42″ plasma TV with the wires dangling from it.

At worst … well, we’re sadly familiar with the racially coded language of suburban fearmongering.

I find it particularly amusing that the editor of this website acknowledges that some public transportation would be helpful, just not METRO. As if the city’s crowbar-to-the-back-door set has Q cards and fierce brand loyalty.

Houston desperately needs more transit options. METRO has done a phenomenal job of studying commuting patterns, traffic flow, geographic population distribution, and re-routing under-utilized lines, all of which has improved service.

Opposing a bus line now won’t reduce the crime rate, but it could mean that once the gridlock gets bad enough, people will stop moving to Spring, preferring neighborhoods with better transit options.

Let’s hope that the hardworking residents of Spring who would very much prefer the cost and ease of riding METRO over having to drive a car (and pay for gas, insurance, repairs, and parking) are not cut off from the city because of a few loud opposition voices.

Posted in Houston, sprawl | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Public-Private Partnerships and Free Speech

We differentiate between the government, private, and charitable/social service sectors for a reason. We need all three in a robust democracy. They all serve different functions and are subject to different rules.

While we’re fighting to protect so much else, let’s protect that distinction as well.

Discovery Green, the verdant downtown Houston park that sprouted where once there was only a lunar hellscape of surface parking lots, is often mentioned as a location for rallies and protests.

Sometimes, the park does agree to host political events. As Pokemon Go players discovered last year, however, the park can also shut people out.

If you ask the average Houstonian on the street, they would likely tell you that Discovery Green is a city park.

True. Sort of.

While the land the park sits on is the property of the City of Houston, the programming and rules are controlled by the Discovery Green Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) public charity.

Public may be in the name, but that doesn’t make the space a public one. Public charities do not have the same obligation to accommodate first amendment activities as government entities do.

Governments can put content-neutral restrictions on free speech activities, like requiring that any group wishing to use amplified sound get a sound permit, but they cannot abridge the right of free speech.

Non-governmental entities, on the other hand, like the conservancies that run so many of our heavily-used parks—Memorial Park, Hermann Park, Buffalo Bayou Park—can put whatever restrictions they wish on those activities, and refuse to host those they would prefer not to support.

Public-private partnerships have been all the rage on the civic development and beautification front. We praise the generous donors who support them, as we should.

We should be mindful, however, that we need those donations because of our short-sighted fixation on cutting taxes. Our elected officials have had to seek funding elsewhere, and the price we have paid is the relinquishment of full public rights in public parks.

This surrender of public land and public space has foreclosed upon our options for protest.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the frothing hyena on the House Oversight Committee who attacked Hillary Clinton for her private email server before abruptly retiring from Congress to become a Fox News commentator, kicked off 2016 by sponsoring a bill that would have authorized the sale of 3.3 million acres of public land across ten states. After widespread public outcry, he announced via Instagram that he is withdrawing the bill.

Millions of acres of land draws attention that acre and half-acre parcels do not. If we allow the privatization of public spaces to continue, we will lose more than glorious parkland and scenic vistas. We will lose the public square, a vital ingredient in our civic stew.

We, the people, could refuse to allow our government to sell our right to free speech for the sake of a splash pad and dog run. Yet another issue to monitor, another item to search for on city council agendas, and perhaps a question for a future referendum. As someone once said, and Thomas Jefferson may have also said later, eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.

Posted in Houston, politics | Leave a comment

I Am Not Your Female-In-Character Assistant

Last night, as a friend and I sat greeting people coming to an event we were helping organize at the United Way building (where any nonprofit can rent a room for a function), a man approached. White, balding, walking with purpose.

I said hello, are you here for our event?

No, he said, he was looking for the bat people event.

He wore faded black t-shirt with the bat silhouette Commissioner Gordon used to throw up into the clouds when he was in a pickle.

There’s a huge urban bat colony about a quarter-mile from the building, and we have nonprofits in town dedicated to bat habitat and such, so everything seemed reasonable and his outfit was on point.

I waved toward the only other check-in table set up across the corridor and said well, it must be them.

I watched and listened as he greeted the woman staffing that table, which was only a few feet away from ours.

She was not the bat people either.

He asked her where his group was, then, assuring her that his information said he should come to 50 Waugh Drive and that was this building, correct?

She confirmed that was the address, apologized (as women do), and explained, again, that she did not work there and if he wasn’t there for her event, she did not know where he should be.

He came back to our table. Just as the other woman had done, we suggested he go ask the man at the check-in desk.

He’s not there, the bat man said.

I had checked in with this info desk staffer earlier. A couple of times he got up from his desk to pick things up or get things out of closets or drawers, but I stood by the desk and he returned within a couple of minutes to provide me with the information I sought.

I’m sure he’ll be right back, one of us said.

Several minutes later, I noticed he had returned to the other not-bat-affiliated person to ask if she was sure she did not know where his meeting was.

He looked at us and my compatriot reminded him that we still did not work there.

Her tone was a mite … frosty.

He was a grown, adult man.

He had a cell phone, and he had what appeared to be a printed out email.

He was in a building that has a staffed desk that literally has sign on it promising information.

And he kept returning to women WHO HAD PATIENTLY EXPLAINED MORE THAN ONCE that they did not have the information he was seeking to ask if they were sure they did not have the information he was seeking.

He asked her what she thought he should do. He was clearly getting frustrated.

So was she, but he did not appear to care.

This is not the first time I have seen this happen.

Men of the world, take note. As long as you have opposable thumbs and minimal brain activity—and it was clear this man had both—you have all of the tools you need to solve your problems.

I know this to be true, as I have shown up places and not found what I was looking for and discovered a solution using just my cell phone, quick wit, and ability to self-propel through three-dimensional space.

Women are not here to be your assistant just because you are frustrated and want someone else to make your life easier.

DO NOT DO THIS.

But if you do, and I know you will, consider yourself warned. I will go to the secret place all women go and I will mock you. We will all mock you.

We will tilt our heads and roll our eyes and purse our lips and there will be a firm set to our jaws as we try not to gnash our teeth, because we have all dealt with you, and we know we will never be done dealing with you.

Women are not your female-in-character robot assistants.

P.S. Here’s the clue you will get. The secret place women go to mock men? It is the internet, and I am here, and I will describe you well enough that if you have a drop of self-awareness and happen to come across this, you will know I am talking about you. And I know that is not nice but I do not even care.

Posted in advice you didn't ask for, feminists & feminism | Tagged , | 2 Comments